Bigshoes Foundation Basic Child Health Training Programme
The training of caregivers working in children’s homes and the community in the basics of child health care will empower them to adequately meet the health care needs of children in their care and simultaneously relieve the burden on both the public health care system and their medical clinics and outreach.
VISION
Improving the medical care of orphaned and vulnerable children (OVC), with special emphasis on those affected by HIV/AIDS. They aim to do this by partnering with Government and other organizations to:
- Provide HIV testing, adoption medicals, anti-retroviral (ARV treatment and palliative care for OVC
- Provide child health focused training for child caring professionals and caregivers
- Advocate and influence policy around the health care for OVC
OVERVIEW
The Bigshoes Foundation Basic Child Health Training Programme seeks to empower caregivers working in children’s homes and the community with basic child health skills to adequately meet the health care needs of children in their care as part of their strategy to improve the overall medical care of OVC. The improved capacity of caregivers in this area will improve the basic health of the children in their care. As a result of the intensive training programme, the children receive better nutrition, emotional support, palliative care and management of minor injuries and illnesses. Caregivers are able to monitor the normal development of each child and look out for signs of discord correctly. This will in turn relieve the burden on the public health care system and Bigshoes’ medical clinics and outreach as better management of basic child health means that more time can be spent on complex medical problems, accurate HIV diagnosis and adoption medicals. The comprehensive five-day training programme covers topics including: First Aid ‘save a child’; Hygiene, nutrition and Growth, Routine Health Care and Infectious Diseases; Common Childhood Illnesses and Development; Childhood HIV/AIDS and ART; Disclosure and Paediatric Palliative Care (PPC). The programme specifically targeting caregivers working in children’s homes also includes a module on record keeping in the children’s home.
WHAT WE LIKE ABOUT THIS PROJECT
- Complimentary to other programmes implemented by the organisation
- Responding to an identified need
- Vehicle for sharing good practice in basic child health care
EXPECTED LIFE CHANGE
An investment of R290,767.50 will help approximately 250 child health caregivers be capacitated to adequately respond to the basic health care needs of the estimated 1,500 children in their care. Estimated direct life change at R193.79
NEED
NEED There is an urgent need to improve health care for orphaned and vulnerable children (OVC) living in communities. The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR, defined as the number of children dying in the first year of life per 1000 live births) in South Africa reached 59 deaths / 1000 births in 2002, the worst experienced since 1977. This is believed to be largely due to the effects of the HIV epidemic on children’s health. HIV impacts directly on the health of infected children and indirectly on the health of affected children whose parent’s death or poor health is often a barrier to their own well being. The HIV epidemic has changed the face of children’s homes in South Africa and an increasing number of new children’s homes have been established in response. Unfortunately, the institutions responsible for the children’s homes, have not kept pace with the changing environment. Consequently, there are few systems in place to adequately address the health care needs of children living in difficult circumstances, even those living in registered children’s homes.
ACTION PLAN
Preparation
The training programme has been implemented on an ongoing basis for the past five years and consequently, related preparation is complete. * Training participants are nominated by children’s homes and community based organizations. * Training materials will be printed according to the number of participants. * Pre-tests are conducted to indicate the baseline level of information held by participants
Implementation
- 5 Children’s Home Caregiver workshops of 5 days each (with an average of 25 participants per workshop)
- 5 Community member workshops of 5 days each (with an average of 25 participants per workshop)
Monitoring
- Post-tests are conducted to indicate the change in content knowledge of participants
- Electronic databases record information regarding the training participants and training activities.
- Statistics collected by trainers are sent to the Assistant Director on a monthly basis for collation.
- Changing patterns are identified and programmes are modified accordingly.
ORGANISATION ASSESSMENT
Purpose
Bigshoes has a clear definition and expression of the organisation’s reason for existence, which developed out of research conducted in 2003. This research was focused on the impact of HIV on the Johannesburg children’s homes. Their mission statement is formally documented and used to inform the organisation’s activities in line with their intended social impact. Through their extensive networks and continuous engagement with their target beneficiaries, the organization maintains a current understanding of the social issue they are addressing.
Strategy
The organization’s core programmes and services are well-defined and complimentary as an overall strategy to achieve their mission. Their service offering is focused on four key components including: medical clinics and outreach, paediatric palliative care, an abandoned baby project and basic child health training. Bigshoes Foundation proactively participates in a wide range of relevant collaborations, alliances and networks to enhance their impact and contribute to organizational learning. They have well-established relationships with hospitals, children’s homes, hospices, NPO’s delivering complimentary services, government departments and research institutions.
The organisation reviews its strategy and approach based on its knowledge of current good practice and a dynamic environment leading to changing needs. The organisation was previously known as the Children’s Homes Outreach Medical Programme (CHOMP) and changed its name and expanded its focus beyond children’s homes in 2005 when they identified that, the conditions under which many orphaned and abandoned children in communities live, increases their vulnerability. Consequently, the target group expanded beyond children’s homes to include OVC living in grandparent and child headed households in communities. The change in name of the organization followed accordingly.
Bigshoes Foundation also contributes to the body of knowledge in their area practice through the sharing of research, materials and lessons learnt. The original research informing the establishment of Bigshoes was submitted in fulfillment of a Masters Degree in Paediatrics and was published. Bigshoes also influences practice through the sharing of lessons learnt and modeling good practice in their training programme for child caregivers and policemen and social workers (abandoned baby project). Although Bigshoes has a limited geographic reach, they have plans to replicate their model, which they have begun in Durban and have begun the national roll-out of a specific training programme at the invitation of the National Association of Child Care Workers (NACCW).
Resources
Bigshoes Foundation has a clear understanding of the key resources (staff, expertise, systems, infrastructure, finances, leadership) they need to function optimally and deliver on their social mission. They generally have the resources they require to function at present, but could do with additional ‘gap funding’ in the area finances and would like an IT specialist to consult on their data capturing and management information (MIS) systems to see where they could improve. The management team has experience, skills and expertise in their area of social development and in organizational management.
Bigshoes Foundation initially ran as a programme under Wits Health Consortium due to the nature of its inception (out of research). They are currently in the process separating and formally registering as a separate organisation and plan to be operating independently as of Jan 2009. To date, they have registered as a Section 21 company and have an active board in place, with two outstanding members to be nominated. Bigshoes has appointed a consultant from KPMG to manage the NPO and PBO registration processes and establishment of founding documents.
The organisation has an internal staff member who will fulfill their Human Resources Function and they are currently actively recruiting a bookkeeper. Their payroll function will be outsourced to Labournet.
The organisation recognizes the value of a well-defined fundraising strategy and is currently formalizing a strategy for growing and diversifying their funding base. They make use of an annual fundraising plan. Members of the management team with experience in fundraising drive the fundraising process.
Governance
As mentioned above, Bigshoes Foundation is in the process of finalizing and establishing most of their governance structures, including formal registration, financial and related external reporting systems.
Bigshoes Foundation makes use of some electronic database and management reporting systems. The clinic programme keeps a database record of all activities. They generate quarterly statistical reports on their activities from this and include anecdotal input from the doctors.
The organisation conducts financial planning and a budget, which guides plans and activities. They do not currently have independent financial statements as they currently still fall under Wits Health Consortium. Hey report donors in their required formats.
Sustainability
Bigshoes Foundation is currently reliant on a relatively small base of funders for the majority of their annual funding requirements. They have implemented some income generating activities, which seem to be carried out more on an ad hoc basis rather than a comprehensive strategy. They request contributions towards the costs of the five-day training programme and a fee of R600 for the course, where possible. They also receive a R300 contribution from children’s for the adoption medicals when it is for overseas families who can afford it.
The organisation will also become eligible for government subsidies from the Departments of Health and Social Development when they are fully registered as an NPO. They anticipate that this process will be complete by April 2009 and will subsequently apply for the relevant subsidies to improve their sustainability.
The organisation has reasonably strong and varied leadership and can continue to function according to its current strategy without the presence of one or two key individuals. They have recently appointed a new Executive Director, who is being developed for the leadership of the organisation under the current Chief Executive Officer.
The organisation currently conducts planning for one year at a time, which has not been documented in the past. They are currently working towards the development of comprehensive strategic planning and have appointed an external facilitator for their September 2008 strategic planning session. They are also reportedly including a focus on enhancing their demonstration of impact in this strategic planning session. To date, their systems have recorded output-related activities and achievements with some discussion and insight around developmental outcomes but no formal testing of this. There has been no external evaluation of the organisation’s performance and results.
Project Profile BH-GP-MAR08-0002
Organisation: Bigshoes Foundation
Sector: Health
Project Duration: 12 months
Project Budget: ZAR 290 750
Shares Issued: 5815
Shares Available: 0
Risk Assessment (0 to 5)
Concept: 4.1
Design: 3.7
Capability: 3.9
Control: 2.8
Sustainability: 3.3
External: 0
Organisation Rating (0 to 5)
Purpose: 4
Planning: 3
Performance: 3
Resources: 4
Governance: 2
Sustainability: 2
Project Budget
| Project Management Costs | Year 1 | |
| Project / Financial Manager - Administration of training, bookings, marketing, logistics | 100 000 | |
| Executive Director | 110 000 | |
| HR / Fundraiser | 55 000 | |
| Locums / Doctors - Doctor is actively involved in mentoring care workers in homes | 99 760 | |
| Sessional Trainers - professional nurse and midwife | 57 600 | |
| Half post Trainer - psychologist | 23 040 | |
| Sub-total | 445 400 | |
| Project Materials, Supplies and Admin Costs | ||
| Training Materials - Facilitators guides, training manuals, files, paper etc | 30 000 | |
| Catering -R35 pp x 25 people x 5 days x 10 trainings a year | 35 000 | |
| Booklets and Resuscitation Kits - R50 per booklet with resus mouthpeice and gloves on keyring | 11 970 | |
| Stationery - Flipcharts, name tags, pens, pre- and post-tests | 5 000 | |
| Nashua Copier Rental | 8 000 | |
| Telecommunication Costs (Telephone/Fax/Internet) - Training related communication costs | 5 000 | |
| Sub-total | 94 970 | |
| Venue Hire, Travel and Relevant Equipment | ||
| Venue Hire of Training Room- 11% of total office rent for space used for training | 6 000 | |
| Resuscitation Dolls | 19 500 | |
| Road Travel/Rent-a-car - 68.5kms @ R2.92 p/km per month | 2 400 | |
| Sub-total | 27 900 | |
| Project Monitoring and Other Costs | ||
| Training Accreditation | 12 000 | |
| Continuing Medical Education -Conferences, workshops and development of trainers | 13 230 | |
| Cleaning Costs | 5 000 | |
| Sub-total | 30 230 | |
| Grand Total Expenditure | 598 500 | |
| Project Sources of income Please include any income generated from the project and amounts committed by donors | ||
| Description | Year 1 | |
| Ruth Dubin Trust, Rockerfeller Bros Fund, Discovery and Johannesburg City Council, Infant Trust | 340 040 | |
| Grand Total Income | 340 040 | |
| Project Financial Summary | ||
| Total Expenditure | 598 500 | |
| Total Income | 340 040 | |
| Surplus/(Shortfall) | -258 460 | |
| SASIX Administration Fee | 32 307.50 | |
| TOTAL | 290 767.50 | |
Project Sector
Health
While South Africans access to primary health care services has improved in the new democracy, we still face serious health care challenges that unacceptably burden the country and impact negatively on our social stability and economic potential. The Health Systems Trust reports that we continue to have unacceptably high levels of infant mortality and maternal mortality, and high rates of new infections with tuberculosis and HIV/Aids. The major health care challenge remains the provision of equitable, quality, integrated primary health care services that encourage community participation. This challenge includes interventions that address the health care needs of vulnerable children, people with high risk of HIV infection, people living with HIV/Aids, people living in rural areas, older people, people living in informal settlements, homeless people, women, people living with disabilities, low-income groups and previously disadvantaged groups.
The public health care system cannot currently meet these challenges alone, and multi-sectoral partnerships between government, non profit organisations, businesses and individuals are essential if we are to achieve and then sustain equitable, quality primary health care for all. Social profit organisations play a vital role in partnering with government to increase people's access to vital health promotion, education, services and programmes. Many of these projects focus on building the capacity of communities to prevent and combat the disease and ill-health that otherwise weaken the country as a whole.
Opportunities exist to invest in projects that promote community involvement in health care and education on healthy living and prevention of communicable diseases; that augment and enhance the government's provision of services in maternal health, child health, HIV/Aids prevention and treatment, STIs prevention and treatment, TB prevention and treatment, health care for the aged and health care for the disabled including rehabilitative services; and provide training, organisational development and other capacity building for primary health care workers, community health workers, community rehabilitative workers and community health organisations.
SASIX Evaluation Metrics
The organisational rating
In partnership, Trialogue and The Funding Site developed an expert organisational capacity diagnostic test, which has been further refined by GreaterGood South Africa based on its consultations with Geneva Global and others active in this area. The result is a comprehensive evaluation and verification tool that GreaterGood South Africa uses to assess the capacity of non profit organisations according to both qualitative and quantitative metrics. The tool encompasses the purpose, strategy, performance, resources, governance and sustainability of the organisation and its activities. GreaterGood South Africa project managers are employed in the field to conduct the evaluations with the organisations implementing SASIX projects. The results of their findings are assessed through a peer review process, and then coalesced into the organisational ratings presented on the front page of each SASIX Project Profile.
The project risk assessment
In consultation with Geneva Global, GreaterGood South Africa uses a comprehensive risk assessment tool to evaluate target projects - a tool that encompasses the project's concept, design, capability, control, sustainability and external factors that will or may affect the successful implementation of the project. At the completion of the project, GreaterGood South Africa will issue a Project Performance Report that compares the actual life change with the expected life change forecasted on the front page of this profile. This report will also include the key lessons learned.
GreaterGood South Africa Services
Project identification - Through wide, expert consultation and screening processes, GreaterGood South Africa identifies top South African non profit programmes that address the greatest development needs in the country.
Site visits - In order to become a recommended SASIX project, GreaterGood South Africa's project managers must have seen the project first-hand and undertaken the necessary evaluation interviews with the project's implementer(s).
Desk research - International best practices and other references are used as benchmarks to measure the projects.
Peer review - Information gathered and project profiles are assessed through a peer review process.
Deal structure - GreaterGood South Africa's project managers work closely with the project implementers to establish the parameters with regard to the expected results, time-frames, monitoring processes, use of funds, budget and final evaluation.
When you invest in a SASIX project, GreaterGood SA will:
Document the agreement - Before funding is supplied to a project, GreaterGood South Africa concludes a Memorandum of Agreement with the organisation which covers expected results, timelines, reporting frameworks and acceptable uses of funds.
Assist with funds transfers - GreaterGood South Africa will assist with the necessary transfers of funds, according to the funder's requirements.
Obtain receipt of funds - GreaterGood South Africa confirms when the funds arrive with the project implementer.
Check progress - At around 3 months, GreaterGood South Africa confirms that the project is proceeding according to plan. The project managers are available to project implementers for advice and consultation on an ongoing basis.
Measure results - After the conclusion of the project, GreaterGood South Africa collects the necessary data and compiles a Project Performance Report which includes an analysis of the outcomes and the lessons learned. Each funder of every SASIX project receives the report.
To fund this project
Please contact: SASIX
Tel + 27 21 794 0580
Fax: 27 21 794 2239
Email: sasix@ggsa.co.za
Postal address: Postnet Suite 293, Private Bag X16, Constantia 7848, South Africa
